Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Obama. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Obama. Afficher tous les articles

Terrorisme

Dans le billet du 2 mai dernier de son blog Keeping the Faith publié sur JewishJournal.com, Ilana Angel parle de l'assassinat d'Osama ben Laden. Elle y cite notamment le nom des 2819 personnes disparues le 11 septembre 2001 dans et autour du World Trade Centre et souhaite la paix à leurs âmes. Elle parle de nombreux chiffres qui font mal: 289 corps, 19858 morceaux de cadavre, 1717 familles sans rien à enterrer, 1609 veufs et veuves, 3051 orphelins...

Puis Ilana parle et remercie les militaires américains et leurs familles pour leur combat pour la liberté.

Mais Ilana ne fait pas mention des milliers de civils innocents tués lors de la guerre contre le terrorisme déclenchée par les américains par la suite. Ilana oublie les âmes des enfants, des femmes et des hommes victimes de kamikazes ou de balles perdues.

D'une part, sur la twittosphère il y a des réactions ulcérées de personnes comme Michael Moore ("On dit d'OBL qu'il avait une fortune de $30 millions de dollars (..) pourquoi aucun journal n'a titré: "un multi-millionnaire tue 3000 personnes" (...) Il était aussi musulman que Timothy McVeigh était catholique, mais personne n'a dit: "Un catholique fait exploser un immeuble fédéral à Oklahoma City" (...) pourquoi mettre l'emphase sur le fait qu'il est musulman?"

D'autre part, il y a la peur qui noue encore plus les entrailles du peuple américain, comme celles de ce pilote de ligne de la compagnie Delta qui a refusé (!) de transporter des passagers à cause de leur religion et de leurs vêtements. Il n'a pas encore été viré, les passagers sont tout juste arrivés 9h en retard à leur meeting, une conférence -comble de l'ironie- d'Imams nord-Américains.

Ben Laden est mort. Mais qui gagne vraiment la guerre contre le terrorisme si les droits et libertés sont brimées par peur et par ignorance? Tous ces disparus pourront-ils vraiment reposer en paix, parce qu'il a rendu l'arme à gauche? Avons-nous utilisé les bons moyens pour lutter contre les atrocités commises le 9 septembre 2001?

Terrorisme (d'après le Larousse): Ensemble d'actes de violence (attentats, prises d'otages, etc.) commis par une organisation pour créer un climat d'insécurité, pour exercer un chantage sur un gouvernement.

Obama et le conflit israélo-palestinien

Barack Obama speaking at a campaign rally in A...Image via Wikipedia

L'heure du bilan (partiel) a sonné pour le président Barack Obama.

Un commentaire très intéressant au sujet du conflit israelo-paléstinien a attiré mon attention. Dans une interview accordée au Time, il reconnaît que l'environnement politique interne de chaque partie est tel qu'il ralentit tout engagement dans un dialogue quelconque: "Both sides — the Israelis and the Palestinians — have found that the political environment, the nature of their coalitions or the divisions within their societies, were such that it was very hard for them to start engaging in a meaningful conversation."

Cette interview est publiée en ligne à: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1955072-1,00.html


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Five Leadership Lessons From Obama's First Month

Forbes:
http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/25/obama-lessons-president-leadership-managing_ceo.html
Shaun Rein

The president has done three things that all CEOs should do--and two they should avoid.

It has been a little more than a month since President Obama was sworn in as the 44th President of the United States. He's riding a wave of massive popularity and has assembled a team of this generation's best and brightest, but the economy still is lurching, with stock-market indexes hitting decade-old lows. Americans are scared, and senior executives are facing the most challenging business climate of their lifetimes.

As new paradigms for leadership emerge and old strategies go out the door, corporate chiefs need to rethink how they manage. Some companies will come out of the downturn stronger, others in bankruptcy. More than ever, strong, decisive and confident leadership will be the difference between thriving and collapsing.

We can take a page from Obama's playbook and his Feb. 24 speech to Congress for tips on what to do and what not to do. His first month has been marked by some great foresight and a few misguided moves. Here are five key lessons from his first weeks in office.

Lesson 1: Have a Strong Brand and Position in the World
Right away the president started rebranding the nation. America was known as the beacon of freedom and a better way of life until its standing in the world took a hit during the Bush administration. Obama signed legislation to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay on his first day in office. He has taken practical rather than ideological stands on Iran and Cuba. He has reached out to Muslims and people of sometimes unfriendly nations to encourage them to look to America as a benevolent superpower--and a good economic partner.
Senior executives need similarly to use the downturn to hone their corporate brand images to incorporate new realities, as consumers rethink their needs, look for value and cut back on discretionary spending.
Starbucks (nasdaq: SBUX - news - people ) has announced that it will enter the instant coffee market after spending decades positioning itself as a daily luxury treat and distancing itself from the Nestlés and Maxwell Houses of the world. The company realizes the world has changed and it can no longer rely on consumers shelling out $4 for lattes with whipped cream and cinnamon.


Lesson 2: Don't Lose Sight of the Long Term
In her first trip to China as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton pushed the Chinese government to cooperate to lower greenhouse emissions. Getting the Chinese to buy more Treasury bills or ensure human rights played second fiddle to pursuing the long-term goal of reducing the costs of pollution and reliance on oil. It's expensive, but it's a must do. When the economy gets going again, China and the U.S. will need a healthy environment and freedom from the whims of oil barons in South America, the Middle East and Africa.

Corporate leaders likewise need to shed fear and continue to make the investments and decisions for future growth even at a cost to their quarterly numbers. Intel (nasdaq: INTC - news - people ) is using the downturn to invest more than $7 billion in innovation, to distance itself from weakened competitors. Who do you think will be best poised to benefit when the business cycle changes? Intel, or its competitors that are slashing their innovation and sales budgets?

The worst thing to do right now is let fear paralyze you so you can't make the decisions that will keep your company competitive in the long run. You may need to invest more in certain areas and cut back in others; you may even need to cut everywhere. But you need to be guided by thoughtful, careful analysis rather than fear.

Lesson 3: Smart P.R. Means Managing Expectations
President Obama has continually lowered expectations about his ability to right the economy quickly. This has given him time to maneuver and allowed for more upside potential. He has maintained very high approval ratings despite the economy's continued slide. Managing the expectations of investors and employees is critical now. One of the biggest mistakes senior executives make is trying to put too positive a spin on a situation.

When General Motors (nyse: GM - news - people ) took bailout money last fall, its management raised expectations that it could figure out how to right itself by February. Now that the company is running back to Congress for another $12 billion, confidence that it will ever right anything is gone. It is hard to keep going back to the trough. Congress and the American taxpayer do not want to feel duped.

The world's best salesmen know that it is better to break conservative quota numbers than to miss overly optimistic projections. Once companies start announcing numbers that blow past analysts' forecasts, investor confidence will grow. That will be critical to starting the recovery.
One caveat, though: Don't push expectations too far down or you'll run the risk of demoralizing the troops. Obama has to walk a fine line, dampening expectations but not freezing the gears of business. That is why he took a more upbeat position during his speech to Congress than he had in recent weeks. And corporate chieftains can't be overly downcast or investors will hammer their stock and top-performing employees will jump ship.

While Obama has made some great moves, he has also made some errors we can learn from.

Lesson 4: Build Consensus--But Don't Let a Minority Hijack the Majority
Obama made being bipartisan and reaching across the ideological divide a big part of his campaign message. And he has stuck to it once taking office. He has appointed a Republican Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, asked a conservative to be Secretary of Commerce, Judd Gregg, and has regularly stepped across the aisle to Republicans in Congress in a way Bush never did with Democrats.

He has been smart to try to build consensus, but he has gone too far. He has spent too much time trying to placate Republicans. By giving them too much voice, he has re-energized them, and he let his stimulus packaged get delayed just when decisive action was needed.

In China, on the other hand, the government pushed through stimulus measures fast enough to buoy consumer confidence. My firm, China Market Research Group, interviewed several hundred Chinese consumers in six cities in January, and 80% of them said they had full confidence that the government would implement the policies needed to right China's economy and maintain stable growth. Gross domestic product is growing rather than contracting.

Senior executives need to be nimble and move fast to adjust to new business realities. Decisions must not be slowed by endless committees trying to get everyone to buy in.

Lesson 5: Conduct Superior Due Diligence, Repeatedly
Obama has had problems vetting candidates for Cabinet positions. From Bill Richardson to Tom Daschle, nominees have had skeletons in the closet far more problematic than Obama's investigators found. In approving them and then having to retract their nominations, Obama damaged his reputation for careful due diligence.

Companies cannot make this mistake. They have to spend whatever due diligence costs. In an age where Allen Stanford's alleged $8 billion Ponzi scheme pales in comparison wtih Bernard Madoff's much bigger one, no one can take reputations at face value. I have been in far too many meetings where someone said, let's do business with so-and-so--he comes from a good family. The days of trust based on reputation are gone. Companies need to conduct due diligence, repeatedly.

In the Great Depression, superior leaders and minds emerged from the ashes. This crisis, too, will see winning executive teams take their companies further beyond their competitors. The biggest CEO of all, the president of the United States, is sure to continue to provide outsized examples of what and what not to do to accomplish that.

Five Leadership Lessons From Obama's Second Month

Here is the second one of Shaun's texts. I don't know about the competition one and I really question this parallel he makes between public administration and business administration. Companies, for example, are about people, he says. Are government the same?

I believe that few months are too short of a horizon to start getting lessons and drawing conclusions. The world we live in has too much of a short-term vision, we loose patience and we expect too much too fast. I believe the best leadership lesson from Obama is to have accepted to take the lead NOW. Two months after he did, I don't think these lessons, although interesting from a business perspective, are really those we can learn from his leadership.


Forbes:
http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/19/obama-lessons-president-leadership-managing-ceo.html

Shaun Rein, 03.19.09, 06:15 PM EDT

Once again, he has gotten more right than wrong, and we can all learn from his experience.


In the last week or so, we've seen a mini bull run on the stock market, but the U.S. economy is still in bad shape. Another half-million Americans lost their jobs during Barack Obama's second month in office. But the president's approval ratings remain high, despite the rocky economy and the uncertain futures of millions of Americans. Those high ratings reflect the success the president has enjoyed in demonstrating leadership and confidence.
In a follow-up to my Feb. 5 column on lessons corporate leaders could draw from the president's first month in office, here are some lessons to take from his second--from both his best moves and his blunders.


Lesson 1: Localize your Brand
President Obama had Hillary Clinton present different images to different parts of the world on her first tour abroad as Secretary of State, even as she kept to the core American ideals of freedom and democracy. In Asia, she was relaxed and unscripted, answering questions from Korean schoolgirls about her favorite rock 'n' roll bands and how she had first fallen in love with Bill. In the Middle East she presented another image, a more cautious and conservative one that fit better with the ideals of conservative Muslim states.

In presenting those different images, Clinton effectively localized America's brand. Global brands often try to take the exact position that worked in the U.S. to foreign markets. But what works in one country often fails in another. There are all too many business school case studies of companies like eBay (nasdaq: EBAY - news - people ) and Home Depot (nyse: HD - news - people ) that failed to localize their images to fit local tastes and suffered as a result.

For instance, Wal-Mart (nyse: WMT - news - people ) has botched selling to China's emerging middle class, 250 million strong, because its "everyday low price" image doesn't resonate there. In China, people worry constantly about counterfeit baby formula and shoddy products. More affluent consumers, not value-conscious ones, are the patrons of big-box retailers. They go there because they trust they'll be buying genuine products. More price-sensitive shoppers stick to dingy mom-and-pop shops that operate on paper-thin margins and offer everyday low prices--and everyday poor quality.

Pizza Hut, the Yum! Brands (nyse: YUM - news - people ) chain, is hardly upscale in the U.S., but it has enjoyed considerable success in China by branding itself as a place for the upper-middle class to go to on dates or gatherings with colleagues. The restaurants have modern design and fabulous service. They cater to members of China's middle class who aspire to a more comfortable and better life.

As companies look to new growth markets like China during these difficult times, their executives need to determine how to leverage their core brands in those markets. In so doing, they need to adapt to fit local tastes, as both Obama and Pizza Hut have done.


Lesson 2: Embarrass the Competition
In the last month, jiggly, pill-popping Rush Limbaugh emerged as the poster boy for the GOP. When he said on national radio that he hoped Obama would fail, he gave White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel fuel for roasting the Republican leadership. Egged on by Emanuel, Limbaugh won a verbal boxing match with Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, exposing the weakness and dividedness of the GOP and disenfranchising a good chunk of more moderate voters.

Business leaders should take heed during these times of changing consumer habits and launch marketing campaigns that will weaken the competition. Procter & Gamble (nyse: PG - news - people ) has done this recently in promotions for its Olay brand, which positions itself as high-end yet inexpensive. This resonates with women who feel they must cut back on their cosmetic purchases.

Olay's advertisements encourage consumers not to waste money on competitors' unnecessarily expensive face creams. The brand's Regenerist Micro-Sculpting Cream, less than $30 in drug stores, is "more effective than the department store cream costing $350. You just don't get a chic shopping bag." The pitch makes spending money on expensive cosmetics in this economy seem ridiculous.

As consumers look to stretch their shopping dollars, marketers need to differentiate from their competition more than ever and show why they are more worthy, just as Obama's underlings have done regarding the GOP.

Lesson 3: Listen to the Research
Obama's administration uses research methods like polling and focus groups to better understand its constituents' needs. White House polling to get a pulse on trends is not new, but the Obama administration has used it more aggressively than others, not only to gauge the popularity of policies but also to learn how to sell them to the American people and Congress.
Most notably, Obama used polling to help win support for his stimulus package. Based on data from focus groups, his advisers encouraged lawmakers to say investment instead of infrastructure and recovery instead of recession. These words had been found to be more appealing to voters.

The president didn't need sophisticated research to know that the American people were angry about giving hundreds of billions of their tax dollars to the financial institutions that caused the economic mess, and about outlandish executive pay and bonus packages. But he has made sure to react swiftly and surely. He switched this week to a much harder line against AIG (nyse: AIG - news - people ) and other institutions receiving TARP funding, directing Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to use all possible legal measures to get back the $165 million in bonuses given to executives at AIG's troubled financial products unit.

Now more than ever, companies must switch from being product-focused to being consumer-focused. Just as knowledge from polls has been key in helping Obama maintain his high approval ratings and pass major policy initiatives, knowledge from consumer research will be key for companies that are going to grow in this challenging market.

Companies like P&G will come out of the downturn stronger than the competition because of their commitment to understanding consumers, just like during the Great Depression. Since 2000, P&G has turned its business around by spending more than $1 billion on consumer research and dedication to innovation to better meet consumer needs. Companies like P&G that focus on what consumers need now will be the ones that emerge ahead when the economy picks up again.

While Obama made some great moves in his second month in office, he again failed in important areas, too.

Lesson 4: Avoid Number Traps
To pass his stimulus package, Obama promised that it would "create or save" 3.5 million new jobs. While it is important to be strong and clear in the face of adversity, to build confidence among the American people, Obama took a risk floating such a precise number--though the "or save" part should make the number harder to hold against him. He leaves himself open to charges that he never reached that number. He gave his critics fodder to lambaste him.
Corporate chieftans outlining future goals should always be confident and transparent but should never get tied down unnecessarily. GE's stock price got hammered when CEO Jeffrey Immelt said on CNBC that the company would absolutely not cut its dividend--only to turn around and do so a few weeks later.

In this downturn you should give specifics on how you plan to reach your goals and on the policies you plan to enact to achieve them, rather than on precise growth targets. A focus on quarterly numbers is shortsighted and can prove very damaging to morale and the stock price if the numbers fall short of expectations.

Lesson 5: Closely Manage Your H.R.
Obama has done well creating a State Department full of talent, led by Hillary Clinton and superstar diplomats George Mitchell and Richard Holbrooke. But he has left the Treasury Department understaffed and floundering just when it needs manpower the most. Beneath Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, hardly any top deputies have been named. In the words of former Treasury spokesman Tony Fratto, the secretary is "fighting a war on multiple fronts without generals there to help him."

Geithner's aides are stretched thin, and he has an army of advisers but no one else with any real authority. British government officials have complained that they couldn't reach anyone to talk to, and the insurance giant AIG has floundered without anyone from the Treasury really explaining to it the terms of the bailout.

Companies are always about people--quality people. In these difficult times more than ever, companies need the best people to help steer them. They need to attract talent and distribute it between divisions. It's no good to have all your stars in one department and leave others high and dry.

The strongest, most innovative companies always make sure they acquire talent in all areas, from research and development to marketing to sales. Top talent always wants to go where it is valued, to companies such as Apple (nasdaq: AAPL - news - people ) or Google (nasdaq: GOOG - news - people ), and that's why, despite getting hit hard, they are still doing better than everyone else.

Companies should continue to watch closely and learn from Obama's leadership initiatives as a key source of insight into what works in this challenging economy. His second month has been rockier than his first. Let's hope that his third is better and that the U.S. economy really does come out of its recession later this year, as Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke predicted last week.

An evening with Obama...

... as funny and serious as ever. I think we may misunderstand the man's message. He does not pretend to change the world, he is offering a more rational vision of the things we put in place and that lead us to destruction. It seems to be a "look-frankly-and-stop-lying-to-yourself-and-to-others" approach to the main issues.


American Envy: Obama au Canada

Ça y est, il est passé. On l’a vu ou juste entrevu. On lui a souri et on l’a poursuivi. Il n’est guère resté plus de six heures, mais ça a largement suffit. Son charme er son charisme ont provoqué l’ « American Envy » chez bon nombre d’habitants de la capitale nationale et auprès des personnes qui avaient fait le déplacement pour le voir. Certains se sont même surpris en train de rêver à rouler un jour dans une Cadillac appelée The Beast...

Dans sa grande largesse, Barack Obama a même « stimulé » l’économie canadienne, en achetant des cookies pour ses filles. En quelques heures, la boulangerie a écoulé tous ses cookies! On est passé des Nuun Bush (chaussures Bush) aux Cookies Obama. Quelle drôle de pensée: l’homme le plus puissant du monde a pris l’avion pour passer six heures chez ses voisins d’en haut (ceux qui habitent des igloos – ses filles lui poseront sans doute la question) et faire quelques achats pour ses filles. Son arrêt impromptu s’est fait au grand dam de sa garde rapprochée pour qui c’est encore un cauchemar de le protéger. Au fait, pourquoi est-ce qu’ils se font appeler les services « secrets » alors qu’ils sont aussi visibles?

Un des plus beaux moments de sa visite aura été sans doute sa rencontre avec Michaëlle Jean. Pour la première fois de l’histoire, le Canada et les USA sont « dirigés » par des noirs. Dirigés entre guillemets, car Jean n’a qu’un rôle représentatif, mais 2008 aura tout de même été une année marquante pour ces deux personnalités. Obama a été élu président des États-Unis et Jean a littéralement sauvé le gouvernement Harper à deux reprises. D’abord, en déclenchant des élections qu’il ne pouvait pas déclencher car il avait promis à tout le monde de ne pas le faire (il a fait voter une loi pour des élections régulières quand il était à l’opposition) Jean donnait aux Conservateurs la chance de prendre les rennes du pouvoir pour quelques années. Mais elle a dû fermer le Parlement pour quelques semaines lorsque le budget Harper, présentant de sérieuses lacunes, risquait de mettre ce dernier en échec face à une coalition de l’opposition. En un mot, Jean a eu un agenda politique chargé l’an dernier, et bien mérité sa rencontre entre chefs d'états avec Obama.

En passant, pour rire un peu, je vous invite à regarder ceci: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFi9OWsI8eg. C’est amusant de voir à quel point les américains du « terroir » peuvent être conservateurs.

Michaelle Jean: http://rodonline.typepad.com/rodonline/2009/02/obama-and-michaelle-jean-canadas-first-black-governor-general.html

B.O. by H.S.

Bon ça y est, il est élu. Et il a pris fonctions le 20 janvier à midi. Pis?

Ben, ça brasse en tabar$*#&! Guantanamo, gel des salaires de la haute administration, lutte pour garder son BlackBerry, téléphones aux gouvernements des pays de l'OCDE, le gars va vite en besogne. Un peu perdu dans sa nouvelle maison (where should I go in this "pretty big house?"), il n'en perd pas moins une minute de sa vie de famille et son emploi du temps est chargé.

Haroon Siddiqui pousse loin son analyse de l'élection de Barack Obama, mais c'est surtout la conclusion de son article, http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/528630, "Obama, by just being who he is, has put fellow Americans on an irreversible journey to national reconciliation" qui suscite la réflexion. Peut-on forcer un peuple à se réconcilier? L'immense pouvoir politique d'Hillary Clinton, par exemple, a mené Obama à lui confier un portefeuille très important, mais ses vues à elle sont parfois radicales. De quelle réconciliation parle t-on, si au sein même du cabinet, des forces centrifuges s'excercent constamment? Écoutera t-elle son chef en ce qui a trait aux décisions (plus ou moins) importantes quand elle n'en faisait qu'à sa tête lors de la présidence de son mari, et qu'elle lui a mené une lutte féroce lors des primaires? La politique a sans doute ses raisons, que la raison ne connaît point... et l'habileté d'Obama à écouter en plus attentivement ses opposants sera très utile dans ce processus.

Le commentaire de Saywhat (Uber-left!???? The Star...!?? Siddiqui...!???)est en contradiction avec bien d'autre et soulève la question de la mâturité de certains bloggers (Eggie: The guy isn't even elected and he is already being put). Sans doute des fidèles lecteurs des chroniques de Siddiqui, mais quand-même...

Pour plus de lecture, voir: http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/94618